Let's get a discussion going on the problem of suffering. In the Gracepoint Berkeley Apologetics class, we talked about how the problem of suffering is a problem only if we can show that suffering is purposeless. What do you think about that?
Also, another useful apologetics skill is to test the "range" of possibilities. So let's ask: what if there IS random suffering? What are the ramifications of that proposition to Christianity?
English Patient: Self-Flagellation - *Setting: *Brother X talking about overly beating himself up... X: Ah man.. I'm so self-flatulating. Views expressed in this posting is solely those of the...
2 hours ago